The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
The Good the Bad and the Ugly is an applied exercise in which participants share three candid assessments of a shared experience: what worked well, what did not work, and what was genuinely uncomfortable or problematic. The structure creates a psychological safety container for honest group evaluation by naming all three registers explicitly.
Structure
The Frame
The facilitator introduces the three categories: the Good (what worked), the Bad (what did not work), and the Ugly (what was genuinely difficult or problematic). All three are treated as equally valid and necessary.
The Round
Participants share one item per category, going around the group. Each person names a good, a bad, and an ugly from the shared experience being reviewed.
No Defensiveness
The facilitator holds the norm that items in all three categories are received without debate or defense. The goal is inventory, not evaluation.
Synthesis
After all participants have shared, the group identifies themes across the three categories and uses the synthesis to inform next steps or changes.
How to Teach It
Objectives
The Good the Bad and the Ugly gives permission structures to the full range of honest assessment. Many retrospective formats implicitly reward positive feedback and discourage critical feedback. By naming the Ugly explicitly, the exercise legitimizes difficulty.
Facilitation Notes
The Ugly is the key category. If participants consistently minimize or skip it, the frame has not been established clearly enough. Model a genuine ugly yourself before asking participants to share.
Common Pitfalls
Participants often convert their uglies into softened bads. The distinction matters: a bad is something that did not work; an ugly is something that caused discomfort, friction, or harm. Hold the distinction.
In Applied Settings
Project Retrospectives
The Good the Bad and the Ugly is used as a structured retrospective format in project management and agile contexts. Its three-category frame surfaces information that single-valence retrospectives miss.
Team Debrief
After a significant event, presentation, or team challenge, the exercise gives everyone a structured turn to assess the full experience rather than defaulting to either celebration or complaint.
Training Program Design
Facilitators use the format to evaluate their own programs, collecting participant feedback that includes genuine difficulty rather than only satisfaction.
Skills Developed
Worth Reading
See all books →
Improve
How I Discovered Improv Comedy and Conquered Social Anxiety
Alex Graudins
Improvisation for the Spirit
Live a More Creative, Spontaneous, and Courageous Life
Katie Goodman
Process: An Improviser's Journey
Mary Scruggs; Michael J. Gellman
Impro
Improvisation and the Theatre
Keith Johnstone
Improvised Theatre and the Autism Spectrum
A Practical Guide
Gary Kramer; Richie Ploesch
Improvisation On the Edge
Notes from On and Off Stage
Ruth Zaporah
Related Exercises
Offering Support
Offering Support is an applied improvisation exercise in which participants practice the skill of providing support to a partner or team member who is struggling, uncertain, or stuck in a scene or collaborative task. The exercise trains the ability to notice when someone needs help and to offer that help in a way that empowers the recipient rather than taking over.
Emotional Endowment
Emotional Endowment is an applied improv exercise in which partners endow each other with an emotional state or characteristic that the other must accept and embody. One player assigns an emotional reality to their partner -- "You are devastated," "You are secretly thrilled" -- and the partner must accept that endowment fully without negotiating, correcting, or breaking the offer. The exercise develops awareness of emotional offers, the practice of acceptance, and the difference between explaining an emotion and inhabiting it.
A Truth about Me
Participants share personal truths in a structured format, building vulnerability, trust, and authentic connection within the group.
Drawing the Line
Drawing the Line is an applied improvisation exercise in which participants explore personal and group boundaries through physical and verbal activities. Using the stage space and structured improvisational scenarios, participants develop practical awareness of where their own comfort limits are, how to name and communicate those limits clearly, and how to recognize and respect the limits of others. The exercise is used in ensemble-building, trust work, and applied settings focused on consent and professional boundary-setting.
What I Like about That
What I Like About That is an applied exercise in which participants respond to each other's contributions by naming a specific thing they genuinely appreciate about what was just said or done, training affirmative listening, specific positive feedback, and the habit of building on rather than redirecting ideas.
Trust
Trust is a foundational applied exercise in which participants practice physical reliance on a partner, typically through exercises such as leaning, falling, or being guided while eyes are closed. The exercise makes the concept of interpersonal trust concrete and bodily, establishing it as an earned and practiced state rather than an assumption.
How to Reference This Page
The Improv Archive. (2026). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Retrieved March 19, 2026, from https://improvarchive.org/exercises/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly
The Improv Archive. "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly." The Improv Archive, 2026. https://improvarchive.org/exercises/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly.
The Improv Archive. "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly." The Improv Archive, 2026, https://improvarchive.org/exercises/the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly. Accessed March 19, 2026.
The Improv Archive is a systemically maintained repository. The archive itself acts as the corporate author.