Location
Location is the archive label for foundational exercises that train players to establish where a scene takes place through physical behavior, object work, and spatial detail. Across the confirmed source base, the core demand stays consistent: the audience should understand the setting from what the players do in the space, not from a quick verbal label. The exercise develops environmental clarity, specificity, and the habit of treating the setting as an active part of the scene.
Structure
Setup
- Put one player, a pair, or a small group on an empty stage.
- Give them a location directly, or ask them to discover and reveal one through physical choices.
- Keep the first pass focused on environment before conversation takes over.
Core Action
- Players establish the setting by using the space as if it already exists.
- They show doors, furniture, work surfaces, distance, obstacles, and textures through clear physical action.
- If objects are used, they should be used completely and consistently enough that the audience can follow the environment.
- The location becomes legible because the physical details agree with each other.
Adding More Players
- When another player enters, that player must honor the space that is already there.
- If the first player has shown a counter, doorway, sink, waiting area, or narrow hallway, the next player works inside that same map.
- The scene becomes clearer when new players add detail without erasing what is already established.
What The Round Is Training
- clear environmental choices instead of vague general space
- physical evidence before explanatory dialogue
- consistency of object placement and room geography
- shared awareness of the same imagined setting
Common Variations
- silent location work before dialogue begins
- one player starts the room and others join when they understand the place
- object-sequence versions where each player repeats and adds to the environment
- challenge versions where a player names a location problem and another answers inside that setting
When To Stop
- Stop when the setting is clear enough that the audience could describe where the scene is.
- Stop when the group has built enough shared environment for scene work to begin.
- If the room becomes muddy, stop and reset instead of letting the players layer contradiction on top of confusion.
How to Teach It
Objectives
- teach players to make the setting visible
- connect object work to scene clarity
- train consistency of shared space
- reduce the habit of naming a location instead of showing it
How To Explain It
Show us where you are before you talk about it. Use the space, use the objects, and make the room clear enough that we could recognize it without being told.
Teaching Notes
- Start with ordinary places that give players strong physical choices, such as a kitchen, waiting room, garage, or bus stop.
- Coach them toward complete actions. A half-gesture toward a door or sink does not help the room become real.
- Keep reminding the next player to inherit the environment that already exists. The exercise loses value when every entrance quietly redraws the room.
- If dialogue starts too early, pull focus back to the environment. The point of the exercise is that the room does part of the storytelling work.
Common Pressure Points
- Players label the place instead of building it. Why it matters: the audience hears the answer but does not see the world.
- Players choose a place but give only one generic action. Why it matters: one vague gesture does not create a usable environment.
- New players ignore the existing geography. Why it matters: the shared space breaks and the scene loses credibility.
- Players mime objects without weight, size, or exact placement. Why it matters: the room turns abstract and stops giving useful information.
Notes That Appear Directly In Source Material
- Theatresports-style training material uses pantomime and object use to make the location readable before dialogue.
- Johnstone notes that a stage picture can imply a location even before players consciously decide on one.
- Later directing and scene manuals keep returning to the same warning: shorthand office chairs and stock behaviors create lazy environments unless players make more specific choices.
History
Location work appears in the current source base as a durable training concern rather than as one single isolated signature game. The surviving evidence links it to several overlapping lineages: object-based environment work in theatre games, improvisation manuals that train players to reveal setting physically, and later directing texts that warn against generic shorthand when establishing space. Taken together, the material shows location not as a minor scene note, but as a repeated foundational skill in improv and actor training.
Worth Reading
See all books →
Yes, And
How Improvisation Reverses No, But Thinking and Improves Creativity and Collaboration
Kelly Leonard; Tom Yorton
Business Improv
Experiential Learning Exercises to Train Employees
Val Gee
The Actor's Book of Improvisation
Sandra Caruso; Paul Clemens
Comedy and Distinction
The Cultural Currency of a 'Good' Sense of Humour
Sam Friedman
Legislative Theatre
Using Performance to Make Politics
Augusto Boal
Theatrical Improvisation
Short Form, Long Form, and Sketch-Based Improv
Jeanne Leep
Related Exercises
Lugares
Lugares is a scene-building exercise drawn from Spanish-language improv traditions in which the physical location ("lugar") is established as the primary creative force driving the scene. Characters and situations emerge from the performers' relationship to the space. The exercise trains environment-first scene work and demonstrates how place shapes behavior.
Warehouse
Warehouse is a fixed-location scene exercise in which every scene must take place in a warehouse. Performers discover varied dramatic scenarios within the single setting across multiple scenes, discovering how much narrative and character variety a single location can sustain. The constraint teaches specificity within sameness and challenges performers to find what makes each individual scene unique despite sharing a setting.
Scene Painting
Scene Painting is an exercise in which performers verbally describe a detailed environment before or during a scene, building the world through spoken imagery rather than relying solely on physical mime. The technique teaches players to create rich, shared spaces that ground the emotional reality of a scene. It is a tool for making improvised worlds more vivid and specific.
Play With
Play With is a scene exercise in which performers are directed to explore and heighten whatever elements have already emerged in a scene rather than driving toward a predetermined outcome. The coaching directive -- "play with it" -- asks players to treat each established detail, character behavior, or game pattern as material to revisit, expand, and discover rather than move past. The exercise trains the improv muscle of finding satisfaction in the present moment of a scene.
In-Out
In-Out is a scene exercise in which performers practice entering and leaving scenes with purpose and clarity. Each entrance must contribute something specific and each exit must feel earned. The exercise trains awareness of when a scene needs a new element and when a character has served their function.
Acceptance
Acceptance is an applied improv exercise in which participants hear a new location, answer together with "Yes, let's," and immediately populate that environment as people or objects inside it. The exercise turns acceptance into visible behavior: participants must receive the new reality, enter it quickly, and adjust when someone else has already chosen the role they wanted.
How to Reference This Page
The Improv Archive. (2026). Location. Retrieved March 17, 2026, from https://improvarchive.org/exercises/location
The Improv Archive. "Location." The Improv Archive, 2026. https://improvarchive.org/exercises/location.
The Improv Archive. "Location." The Improv Archive, 2026, https://improvarchive.org/exercises/location. Accessed March 17, 2026.
The Improv Archive is a systemically maintained repository. The archive itself acts as the corporate author.