Hall of Justice
Hall of Justice is a scene game set in a courtroom or tribunal in which characters present their cases, testify, cross-examine, and pass judgment on an audience-suggested dispute. The legal framework provides a formal structure -- order, procedure, escalating confrontation -- that generates comedy through the application of courtroom gravity to trivial or absurd subject matter. The game rewards commitment to the legal form and the ability to find rhetoric and passion in any cause.
Structure
Setup
An audience suggestion establishes the dispute to be adjudicated -- typically a trivial, personal, or absurd grievance that the courtroom format will treat with full seriousness. Roles are distributed: a judge, at least one plaintiff, one defendant, and potential witnesses or attorneys.
Opening Arguments
Plaintiff and defendant (or their attorneys) present their cases to the court in formal address. The language should maintain the register of courtroom proceedings -- your honor, I submit, the evidence will show -- while the content escalates toward absurdity.
Testimony and Cross-Examination
Witnesses are called. Testimony reveals new information, contradicts previous claims, or introduces unexpected complications. Cross-examination allows performers to heighten the drama through pointed questioning. The judge maintains (or loses) order.
Judgment
The judge deliberates and delivers a verdict, which may be impartial, clearly biased, or deeply unorthodox. The judgment closes the scene and provides the game's button.
Ending
The gavel falls. The verdict is delivered. The game ends with the judge's final word, which ideally reframes or heightens the entire proceeding.
How to Teach It
Objectives
Hall of Justice trains the ability to commit to formal register under absurd conditions, to build a case with internal logic, and to find genuine passion in trivial causes. It also develops the ability to sustain and respond to escalating confrontation within a structured frame.
How to Explain It
"This is a real court. Real proceedings. Real stakes. Whatever the case is -- however ridiculous it sounds -- treat it with complete legal seriousness. The comedy comes from the contrast, not from winking at the audience."
Scaffolding
Introduce the courtroom vocabulary before play begins: opening statements, your honor, I object, sustained, overruled. This gives performers a shared formal register to commit to and return to when the scene drifts toward chaos.
Common Pitfalls
Performers sometimes abandon the formal register to play the absurdity directly, which collapses the contrast that creates the comedy. The game is funniest when the court treats the ridiculous case with full procedural gravity. Coaches should redirect performers who break form rather than sustaining it.
How to Perform It
Audience Intro
"All rise. Court is now in session. Today's case -- brought to us by the audience -- is about to be heard. Your Honor will preside."
Cast Size
Ideal: 4 to 6 performers. One judge, two opposing parties (or attorneys), and one or two witnesses.
Staging
The judge at a raised or central position; plaintiff and defendant on opposite sides. Clear spatial separation between the court's parties reinforces the adversarial structure.
Wrap-Up Logic
The game ends when the judge delivers the verdict. A strong verdict with a surprising legal rationale provides the best close.
Worth Reading
See all books →
Group Improvisation
The Manual of Ensemble Improv Games
Peter Campbell Gwinn; Charna Halpern
The Young Actor's Book of Improvisation
Dramatic Situations
Sandra Caruso; Susan Kosoff
Improv Ideas
A Book of Games and Lists
Mary Ann Kelley; Justine Jones
Improvisation for the Theater
A Handbook of Teaching and Directing Techniques
Viola Spolin
The Triangle of the Scene
A Simple, Practical, Powerful Method for Approaching Improvisation
Paul Vaillancourt
The Improvisation Game
Discovering the Secrets of Spontaneous Performance
Chris Johnston
Related Games
Chance of a Lifetime
Chance of a Lifetime is a short-form game in which performers are placed in a high-stakes scenario where everything rides on a single moment or decision. The built-in dramatic tension drives emotional commitment and heightened play. The game rewards performers who invest fully in the imagined consequences.
Consciences
Consciences is a scene game in which each main character has an additional performer who voices their conscience, offering moral guidance, warnings, or temptations. The tension between a character's desires and their conscience creates layered comedy and dramatic irony. The game is closely related to Alter Ego but frames the inner voice as a moral authority.
Dry Cleaning Bag of Death
Dry Cleaning Bag of Death is a short-form challenge game in which performers draw slips of paper from a bag, each bearing an increasingly absurd or difficult performance task. Failure to complete the challenge results in theatrical elimination from the round. The randomness of the draw, combined with escalating difficulty, creates suspense and audience investment as the pool of players narrows.
Evil Stick of Gum
Evil Stick of Gum is a scene game in which a cursed or mischievous piece of gum passes between characters, and whichever character is chewing it at any given moment becomes the focus of comic misfortune, transformation, or unusual behavior. The object drives the scene's engine: whoever holds the gum becomes the one things happen to. The game rewards physical specificity, commitment to absurd cause-and-effect, and ensemble play around a shared, escalating object.
Temple of Doom
Temple of Doom is an adventure-style game in which performers navigate an improvised series of traps, puzzles, and dangers within an ancient temple, with the audience providing suggestions for what they encounter. The game rewards physical commitment, creative problem-solving, and the ability to build tension and release within an action-adventure framework.
The Gerbil
The Gerbil is a scene game in which one performer plays a character whose behavior is secretly being controlled or influenced by another performer through hidden signals. The controlled player must justify their involuntary actions within the scene's logic. The game creates comedy through the visible struggle between intention and compulsion.
How to Reference This Page
The Improv Archive. (2026). Hall of Justice. Retrieved March 17, 2026, from https://improvarchive.org/games/hall-of-justice
The Improv Archive. "Hall of Justice." The Improv Archive, 2026. https://improvarchive.org/games/hall-of-justice.
The Improv Archive. "Hall of Justice." The Improv Archive, 2026, https://improvarchive.org/games/hall-of-justice. Accessed March 17, 2026.
The Improv Archive is a systemically maintained repository. The archive itself acts as the corporate author.