The Lawyer is an applied exercise in which participants practice defending any position assigned to them regardless of their personal view, developing the skills of argument construction, flexible perspective-taking, and the separation of personal belief from effective advocacy. The exercise trains the capacity to argue persuasively without attachment to outcome.

Structure

The Assignment

Each participant receives a position to defend: it may be an opinion, a policy, a choice, or a point of view. The position is assigned randomly and may or may not match the participant's actual views.

The Defense

The participant has one to two minutes to present the strongest possible case for their assigned position. They may not hedge, qualify, or signal disagreement. The goal is full commitment to the argument.

The Response

Other participants may ask questions or present counterarguments. The defender holds their position and responds to challenges.

The Debrief

After all participants have defended, the group discusses what it felt like to argue for positions not their own, what the exercise revealed about the structure of persuasion, and what transferred to their own communication.

How to Teach It

Objectives

The Lawyer builds the skill of committed advocacy independent of personal conviction. This is useful for negotiators, managers presenting unpopular decisions, and anyone who must represent a position beyond their own preference.

Facilitation Notes

The quality of the exercise depends on participants fully committing rather than ironizing their position. Signal that the skill being trained is the commitment itself, not the content of the argument.

Common Pitfalls

Participants often break frame to signal that they do not personally hold the assigned position. This undermines the exercise. The productive discomfort of fully embodying a contrary view is where the learning occurs.

In Applied Settings

Negotiation and Sales Training

The Lawyer is used to build the capacity to advocate strongly for a client's position or a product's value, even when the advocate has reservations. Committed advocacy is a trainable skill.

Leadership Development

Managers practice presenting organizational decisions they did not make and may not endorse, developing the capacity to communicate with conviction rather than ambivalence.

Debate and Communication Programs

Facilitators use the exercise to develop the structural thinking that underlies persuasive argument: evidence, logic, anticipation of counterarguments, and consistent framing.

Worth Reading

See all books →

Related Exercises

Arguments

Three players: one in center, two on sides taking opposite positions. The center player must maintain logical and emotional agreement with both simultaneously.

Argue like a Philosopher

Partners practice constructive argumentation following philosophical principles, exploring how to disagree productively while maintaining respect.

Constructive Debate

Constructive Debate is an applied improvisation exercise in which participants practice building on opposing viewpoints rather than dismissing or refuting them. Each contribution requires the speaker to first restate the previous speaker's position accurately and locate something valid in it before introducing their own perspective. The exercise develops the discipline of genuine engagement with competing views as a prerequisite to productive disagreement.

Red Teaming

Red Teaming assigns specific team members the role of critics and challengers during a meeting or brainstorming session. By making the adversarial role explicit and sanctioned, the exercise removes the social risk of disagreement and surfaces objections that would otherwise remain unspoken.

Persuade

Persuade is an applied improvisation exercise in which participants practice influencing others through active listening, building on offers, and authentic communication rather than scripted techniques. Drawing on the improv principle that agreement creates rapport, the exercise develops the ability to read an audience, adapt a message in real time, and lead through connection rather than pressure.

Opposite Side Speech

Opposite Side Speech is a communication exercise in which participants argue for the opposite of their actual position on a topic. One person states a belief or preference, then must immediately switch to advocating passionately for the contrary viewpoint. The exercise builds cognitive flexibility, empathy, and the ability to genuinely inhabit perspectives that differ from one's own.

The Lineage

Explore the schools and structures that influenced or evolved from The Lawyer.

Documented In

The Applied Improvisation Mindset (Dudeck & McClure)

How to Reference This Page

APA

The Improv Archive. (2026). The Lawyer. Retrieved September 28, 2026, from https://improvarchive.org/exercises/the-lawyer

Chicago

The Improv Archive. "The Lawyer." The Improv Archive, 2026. https://improvarchive.org/exercises/the-lawyer.

MLA

The Improv Archive. "The Lawyer." The Improv Archive, 2026, https://improvarchive.org/exercises/the-lawyer. Accessed September 28, 2026.

The Improv Archive is a systemically maintained repository. The archive itself acts as the corporate author.